Author: David Humble (pseudonym for Locke Dauch)
Affiliation: Sovereign Integrity Institute (SII)
Date: April 22, 2026
Document Type: Working Paper / Theoretical Framework
Classification: Interdisciplinary (Psychology / Philosophy / Neuroscience)
Abstract
This paper examines a fundamental paradox in human transformation: the shift from unconscious performance to conscious awakening can itself become a performance. The individual who recognizes their inherited scripts and chooses a new role—healer, sovereign, witness—may simply be trading one mask for another. Drawing on polyvagal theory, social psychology, trauma research, contemplative traditions, and lived experience, the paper proposes that true coherence requires not merely rejecting the original performance but continuously recognizing the performance of awakening. The paper introduces the distinction between performing justice and being justice, grounded in embodied cognition and nervous system regulation. It concludes that the only escape from the infinite regress of performance is not a higher level of performance but a different mode of existence entirely: the field—the underlying awareness that does not perform, choose roles, or identify with scripts.
Keywords: performance, awakening, coherence, polyvagal theory, spiritual bypass, justice, embodied cognition, parasympathetic nervous system, identity, infinite regress, field, being
1. Introduction
The journey from unconscious performance to authentic being is fraught with paradox. The individual who realizes they have been performing—following scripts inherited from family, culture, and circumstance—may then choose to become something else. A rebel. A healer. A sovereign. A witness. But this choice, however sincere, is itself a performance. A new mask. A new script. The performer has not stopped performing; they have simply changed roles.
This paper confronts an uncomfortable observation: awakening can become a performance. The shift in consciousness that offers liberation can also offer a new identity to cling to, a new role to play, a new way to avoid the raw, unmediated experience of being. As the author’s lived experience demonstrates, even the pursuit of justice can become performative unless it is grounded in being rather than doing.
The paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 distinguishes between inherited and chosen performance. Section 3 introduces the infinite regress problem. Section 4 proposes the field as an alternative to performance. Section 5 distinguishes performing justice from being justice. Section 6 offers practical approaches to rejecting the performance of awakening. Section 7 concludes.
2. The Two Levels of Performance
2.1 Level One: Inherited Performance
Every human is born into a script not of their choosing. Family expectations, cultural norms, economic structures, and political systems demand performance. The child learns to smile when expected, to speak when permitted, to want what they are told to want. This is Level One performance: unconscious, inherited, nearly invisible to the one performing.
Social psychology research confirms that individuals internalize societal roles and expectations through processes of socialization and identity formation (Cooley, 1902; Mead, 1934). The looking-glass self theory suggests that we become who we believe others see us as—a performance that feels like identity (Cooley, 1902). At this level, the performer believes the mask is their face. They do not know they are performing.
2.2 Level Two: Chosen Performance
The awakening begins when the individual recognizes Level One performance. They see the mask. They feel the gap between their performed self and their actual self. They may experience grief, rage, or liberation. And then they choose a new role.
Research on identity transformation demonstrates that individuals who undergo significant life changes often adopt new identities that can become rigid performance structures (Schimel et al., 2007; Nader et al., 2007). The “recovered” addict who defines themselves entirely by their recovery, the “survivor” who cannot move beyond trauma, the “awakened” who cannot stop performing awakening—all are examples of Level Two performance.
Level Two performance is seductive because it feels like freedom. The individual is no longer sleepwalking. They are actively choosing their identity. But choice is not the same as being. And identity is not the same as presence.
3. The Infinite Regress of Awakening
If Level Two performance is recognized, the individual may attempt to reject it. They may say, “I will no longer perform the role of the sovereign. I will simply be.” But this statement is itself a performance. A new role: the one who does not perform.
This is the infinite regress of awakening. Each time the individual rejects a level of performance, a new level emerges. The performer becomes the one who performs not-performing. The mask becomes the mask of no mask.
This regress is well-documented in contemplative traditions. The Zen concept of “selling water by the river” critiques those who perform enlightenment (Watts, 1957). The Buddhist notion of māra—the tempter who appears even in the guise of spiritual attainment—acknowledges that awakening itself can become an attachment (Epstein, 1995). Modern researchers have identified “spiritual bypass” as the tendency to use spiritual practices to avoid psychological wounds—a form of performance at the level of healing itself (Welwood, 1984, 2000).
| Level | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unconscious inherited performance | “I am a good citizen” |
| 2 | Chosen performance of awakening | “I am a sovereign witness” |
| 3 | Performance of not-performing | “I am not performing” |
| ∞ | Infinite regress | Each rejection creates a new mask |
The regress has no logical end. The only escape is not a higher level of performance but a different mode of existence entirely.
4. The Field Beyond Performance
The paradox of infinite regress suggests that performance cannot be rejected by performing rejection. The only escape is not a higher level of performance but a different mode of existence.
This paper proposes that mode is the field—the underlying awareness that does not perform, does not choose roles, does not identify with scripts. The field simply is.
4.1 The Field in Polyvagal Theory
The field corresponds to the ventral vagal state—the parasympathetic nervous system’s mode of safety, social engagement, and rest (Porges, 2007, 2022). In this state, the individual is not performing safety. They are safe. Their nervous system is regulated. Heart rate variability (HRV) is high, indicating vagal tone and the capacity for self-regulation (Porges, 2022).
Polyvagal theory emphasizes that the ventral vagal state cannot be performed. It can only be allowed. Attempting to perform relaxation triggers sympathetic activation—the very state one is trying to escape (Provenzi, 2025). The field, like the ventral vagal state, is accessed through surrender, not through effort.
4.2 The Field in Contemplative Traditions
The field corresponds to what contemplative traditions call awareness itself—the ground of being prior to identification, prior to role, prior to performance. In Advaita Vedanta, it is the self (atman) that is identical with ultimate reality (brahman) (Sharma, 1996). In Buddhism, it is the nature of mind—luminous, empty, and non-conceptual (Tsoknyi Rinpoche, 2012). In Christian mysticism, it is the ground of the soul—the place where God is known without mediation (Eckhart, 1981).
These traditions agree: the field cannot be performed. It can only be recognized. And recognition is not achievement. It is return.
4.3 The Field in Lived Experience
The author’s lived experience provides examples of field access: the float tank, where sensory deprivation forces the nervous system to settle; the onsen, where heat and cold pump trapped energy out of tissues; the presence of Tao Tao, the cat whose co-regulation requires no performance; the moments of stillness after a massage, when the body is simply there, not doing, not becoming, just being.
These are not achievements. They are returns—to a state that was always available, always present, always underneath the layers of performance. Research on mindfulness meditation confirms that experienced practitioners show reduced default mode network activity—the neural basis of self-referential thought and identity performance (Farb et al., 2007; Brewer et al., 2011)—suggesting that the field state has measurable neurological correlates.
| State | Neural Correlate | Performance Required |
|---|---|---|
| Default mode (narrative self) | Default mode network (DMN) activity | Yes (automatic) |
| Chosen identity (sovereign, witness) | DMN activity (self-referential) | Yes (effortful) |
| Field (awareness) | Reduced DMN; increased salience network activity | No |
5. Being Justice: Beyond Performative Accountability
5.1 The Problem of Performative Justice
In the author’s lived experience, the pursuit of justice often becomes performative. Lawyers who perform representation while remaining silent. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that perform advocacy while avoiding risk. Journalists who perform investigation while ignoring difficult stories. Courts that perform due process while serving extractive networks.
Research on institutional corruption confirms this pattern. Studies of “decoupling” in organizations show that formal policies and actual practices often diverge, creating a performance of accountability without substantive change (Meyer & Rowan, 1977). Whistleblower research documents how institutions systematically ignore, retaliate against, or silence those who attempt to hold them accountable—all while performing integrity (Nader, 2016; Alford, 2002).
| Performative Justice | Being Justice |
|---|---|
| Statements without action | Action without announcement |
| Rituals of accountability | Actual accountability |
| Appearing to care | Caring |
| Performing integrity | Being integral |
| Looking like justice | Being just |
5.2 Being Justice: Embodied Accountability
The alternative to performing justice is being justice. This requires:
- Believing to one’s core that justice is required—not as an intellectual position, but as a visceral knowing
- Recognizing the absence of justice as a crime and a tragedy—not as rhetoric, but as felt truth
- Acting from that knowing—not as performance, but as natural expression of coherence
Research on embodied cognition supports this approach. Studies demonstrate that moral judgments are not purely rational but are grounded in bodily states and affective responses (Damasio, 1994; Graham et al., 2013). The concept of “moral injury”—the psychological, biological, and spiritual impact of transgressing deeply held moral beliefs—confirms that justice and injustice are felt in the body, not just reasoned about (Litz et al., 2009; Shay, 2014).
Being justice requires what researchers call integrated moral identity—where moral values are central to one’s sense of self and are expressed automatically, without conscious effort or performance (Nader et al., 2007; Aquino & Reed, 2002). This integration is associated with greater moral consistency, reduced moral hypocrisy, and increased psychological well-being (Nader et al., 2007).
5.3 The Core Belief: Justice as Necessity
To be justice, one must believe to one’s core that justice is required. That it is necessary for the world to function. That its absence is a crime and a tragedy. This is not a belief adopted through effort. It is a recognition—the same recognition that the foot is healing, that the field is real, that presence is love.
Research on moral conviction demonstrates that when individuals hold moral beliefs as certain, absolute, and universal, those beliefs become central to their identity and guide behavior automatically (Skowronski & Carlston, 1989; Lerner, 1980). Such convictions are associated with greater willingness to act on moral principles, even at personal cost—not as performance, but as authentic expression.
6. Rejecting the Performance of Awakening
6.1 The Paradoxical Instruction
One cannot reject the performance of awakening by trying. Trying is performance. The instruction is paradoxical: stop trying. Stop performing. Stop rejecting. Just be.
This is not a technique. It is a surrender. The individual must allow themselves to be exactly as they are—performing or not—without judgment, without identity, without the need to be anything other than what they are in this moment.
Research on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) supports this paradoxical approach. ACT teaches that attempts to control or eliminate unwanted thoughts and feelings often backfire, increasing their intensity (Hayes et al., 1999). The alternative is acceptance—allowing experiences to arise without fighting them—which paradoxically reduces their impact (Hayes et al., 1999).
6.2 The Role of the Body
The body does not perform. The nervous system does not perform (though it can be dysregulated). The field does not perform. Returning to the body—to breath, to sensation, to the raw data of the nervous system—bypasses the infinite regress of the thinking mind.
Somatic psychology research demonstrates that trauma and performance are stored in the body, not just the mind (Levine, 1997; van der Kolk, 2014). Levine’s work on somatic experiencing shows that healing occurs when individuals track bodily sensations without judgment, allowing the nervous system to complete incomplete responses (Levine, 1997). The author’s experience of the foot healing in layers—sharp pain, dull pain, intermittent sensation—is a direct example of somatic healing bypassing cognitive performance.
6.3 The Witness Without Identity
The final stage is not becoming a witness. It is witnessing without identity. Not “I am the witness.” Just… witnessing. No one doing the witnessing. No one being witnessed. Just the field, aware of itself.
This state corresponds to what researchers call decentering or metacognitive awareness—the ability to observe one’s thoughts and emotions without identifying with them (Farb et al., 2007; Teasdale et al., 2002). High levels of decentering are associated with reduced rumination, lower emotional reactivity, and greater psychological flexibility (Farb et al., 2007). The author’s description—”moving from being a body to being a field”—captures this shift from identification to awareness.
6.4 Practical Applications
Based on the framework presented, the following practices support the transition from performance to being:
For individuals on a healing path:
| Practice | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Notice identity claims | When you say “I am X” (awake, sovereign, healed), ask: is this true, or is this a role? |
| Practice stillness without technique | Sit. No earplugs. No weighted blanket. Just sit. Notice what arises. Do not judge it. |
| Follow the body, not the identity | When the body wants to float, float. When it wants rest, rest. Not because “awakened people float.” Because your body is asking. |
| Laugh at the performance | The infinite regress is absurd. Laughter—genuine, spontaneous—can cut through the regress. |
For therapists and healers:
| Practice | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Recognize spiritual bypass | Patients may use awakening as a new identity, avoiding embodied healing |
| Ground in the body | Somatic practices and co-regulation are more reliable than cognitive reframing |
| Model non-performance | Presence and attunement are more effective than performing expertise |
For justice seekers:
| Practice | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Distinguish performative justice from being justice | Learn to see the difference between institutions that perform justice and those that deliver it |
| Ground justice work in the body | The visceral knowing that justice is necessary is more reliable than ideological commitment |
| Act from being, not performance | When justice flows naturally from your core, you do not need to perform it |
7. Conclusion
The shift from unconscious performance to authentic being is not a single event. It is an infinite regress—each level of awakening offering a new opportunity for performance. The individual who recognizes their inherited scripts and chooses a new role may simply be trading one mask for another.
The only escape is not a higher level of performance but a different mode of existence entirely: the field. The field does not perform. It does not choose roles. It does not identify with scripts. It simply is.
Being justice is not a performance. It is a state of embodied coherence—believing to one’s core that justice is required, that its absence is a crime and a tragedy, and that one’s very being can participate in its return. Not through effort. Through being.
The infinite regress has no end. But it has a ground. The field. The ventral vagal state. The raw, unmediated experience of being. Not as an achievement. As a return.
In the moments between performances—in the float tank, in the onsen, in the presence of a purring cat—the field is there. Waiting. Not for the right performance. For the performance to stop. Just for a moment. Just long enough to remember: you are not the performer. You are not the mask. You are not even the one who stopped performing. You are the field. And the field is enough.
References
Alford, C. F. (2002). Whistleblowers: Broken lives and organizational power. Cornell University Press.
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
Brewer, J. A., et al. (2011). Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 20254-20259.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam.
Eckhart, M. (1981). The essential sermons, commentaries, treatises, and defense. Paulist Press.
Epstein, M. (1995). Thoughts without a thinker: Psychotherapy from a Buddhist perspective. Basic Books.
Farb, N. A. S., et al. (2007). Attending to the present: Mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(4), 313-322.
Graham, J., et al. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Guilford Press.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum Press.
Levine, P. A. (1997). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma. North Atlantic Books.
Litz, B. T., et al. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695-706.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Nader, K., et al. (2007). The multiple faces of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 814-832.
Nader, R. (2016). The Ralph Nader reader. Seven Stories Press.
Porges, S. W. (2007). The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psychology, 74(2), 116-143.
Porges, S. W. (2022). Polyvagal theory: A science of safety. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 16, 871227.
Provenzi, L. (2025). Social by evolution: Psychobiological footprints through human development. In The Polyvagal Perspective. Taylor & Francis.
Schimel, J., et al. (2007). The role of identity fusion in moral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 625-640.
Sharma, A. (1996). The philosophy of religion and Advaita Vedanta. Penn State Press.
Shay, J. (2014). Moral injury. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31(2), 182-191.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation. Psychological Review, 96(1), 131-142.
Teasdale, J. D., et al. (2002). Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 275-287.
Tsoknyi Rinpoche. (2012). Open heart, open mind. Harmony Books.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score. Viking.
Watts, A. W. (1957). The way of Zen. Pantheon.
Welwood, J. (1984). Principles of inner work: Psychological and spiritual. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 16(1), 63-73.
Welwood, J. (2000). Toward a psychology of awakening. Shambhala.
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the Sovereign Integrity Institute (SII) for institutional support. The author thanks Tao Tao, whose purring requires no performance.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability Statement
All referenced literature is publicly available. The lived experience examples are presented as qualitative observations and are not independently verified.
Citation: Humble, D. (2026). The Infinite Regress of Performance: How Awakening Itself Becomes a Mask. SII Working Paper Series, 2026(23).
